Premium
Liver fibrosis diagnosis by blood test and elastography in chronic hepatitis C: agreement or combination?
Author(s) -
Calès P.,
Boursier J.,
Lebigot J.,
Ledinghen V.,
Aubé C.,
Hubert I.,
Oberti F.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
alimentary pharmacology and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.308
H-Index - 177
eISSN - 1365-2036
pISSN - 0269-2813
DOI - 10.1111/apt.13954
Subject(s) - medicine , transient elastography , concordance , gastroenterology , blood test , pathological , fibrosis , chronic hepatitis , liver fibrosis , elastography , pathology , radiology , ultrasound , immunology , virus
Summary Background In chronic hepatitis C, the European Association for the Study of the Liver and the Asociacion Latinoamericana para el Estudio del Higado recommend performing transient elastography plus a blood test to diagnose significant fibrosis; test concordance confirms the diagnosis. Aim To validate this rule and improve it by combining a blood test, FibroMeter (virus second generation, Echosens, Paris, France) and transient elastography (constitutive tests) into a single combined test, as suggested by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Methods A total of 1199 patients were included in an exploratory set ( HCV , n = 679) or in two validation sets ( HCV ± HIV , HBV , n = 520). Accuracy was mainly evaluated by correct diagnosis rate for severe fibrosis (pathological Metavir F ≥ 3, primary outcome) by classical test scores or a fibrosis classification, reflecting Metavir staging, as a function of test concordance. Results Score accuracy : there were no significant differences between the blood test (75.7%), elastography (79.1%) and the combined test (79.4%) ( P = 0.066); the score accuracy of each test was significantly ( P < 0.001) decreased in discordant vs. concordant tests. Classification accuracy : combined test accuracy (91.7%) was significantly ( P < 0.001) increased vs. the blood test (84.1%) and elastography (88.2%); accuracy of each constitutive test was significantly ( P < 0.001) decreased in discordant vs. concordant tests but not with combined test: 89.0 vs. 92.7% ( P = 0.118). Multivariate analysis for accuracy showed an interaction between concordance and fibrosis level: in the 1% of patients with full classification discordance and severe fibrosis, non‐invasive tests were unreliable. The advantage of combined test classification was confirmed in the validation sets. Conclusions The concordance recommendation is validated. A combined test, expressed in classification instead of score, improves this rule and validates the recommendation of a combined test, avoiding 99% of biopsies, and offering precise staging.