z-logo
Premium
Non‐invasive algorithm of enhanced liver fibrosis and liver stiffness measurement with transient elastography for advanced liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B
Author(s) -
Wong G. L.H.,
Chan H. L.Y.,
Choi P. C.L.,
Chan A. W.H.,
Yu Z.,
Lai J. W.Y.,
Chan H.Y.,
Wong V. W.S.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
alimentary pharmacology and therapeutics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 3.308
H-Index - 177
eISSN - 1365-2036
pISSN - 0269-2813
DOI - 10.1111/apt.12559
Subject(s) - transient elastography , medicine , fibrosis , cohort , chronic hepatitis , receiver operating characteristic , gastroenterology , liver fibrosis , elastography , confidence interval , algorithm , radiology , immunology , ultrasound , virus , computer science
Summary Background The accuracy of Enhanced Liver Fibrosis ( ELF ; ADVIA Centaur, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY , USA ) in assessing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B ( CHB ) is to be determined. Aim To derive and validate a combined ELF ‐liver stiffness measurement ( LSM ) algorithm to predict advanced fibrosis in CHB patients. Methods Using the data of a previously reported cohort of 238 CHB patients, an ALT ‐based LSM algorithm for liver fibrosis was used as a training cohort to evaluate the performance of ELF against liver histology. The best combined ELF ‐ LSM algorithm was then validated in new cohort of 85 CHB patients not previously reported. Results In the training cohort, LSM has better performance of diagnosing advanced (≥F3) fibrosis (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve [ AUROC ] 0.83, 95% confidence interval [ CI 0.76–0.91] than ELF ( AUROC 0.69, 95% CI 0.63–0.75). The optimal cut‐off values of ELF were 8.4 to exclude advanced fibrosis, and 10.8 to confirm advanced fibrosis. In the training cohort, an ELF  ≤ 8.4 had a sensitivity of 95% to exclude advanced fibrosis; an ELF  > 10.8 had a specificity of 92% to confirm advanced fibrosis. In the combined algorithm, low ELF or low LSM could be used to exclude advanced fibrosis as both of them had high sensitivity (≥90%). To confirm advanced fibrosis, agreement between high ELF and high LSM could improve the negative predictive value specificity (from 65% and 74% to 80%). Conclusions An Enhanced Liver Fibrosis ‐ liver stiffness measurement algorithm could improve the accuracy of prediction of either ELF or LSM alone. Liver biopsy could be correctly avoided in approximately 60% of patients.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom