Premium
Short stay unit for patients in acute mental health crisis: A case‐control study of readmission rates
Author(s) -
Sveticic Jerneja,
Turner Kathryn,
Bethi Shailendhra,
Krishnaiah Ravikumar,
Williams Lee,
AlmeidaCrasto Alice,
Stapelberg Nicolas J. C.,
Roy Samit
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
asia‐pacific psychiatry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.654
H-Index - 21
eISSN - 1758-5872
pISSN - 1758-5864
DOI - 10.1111/appy.12376
Subject(s) - medicine , mental health , odds ratio , intensive care unit , indigenous , acute care , odds , emergency medicine , health care , psychiatry , logistic regression , ecology , economics , biology , economic growth
Past evaluations of psychiatric short stay units have shown positive outcomes for patients, yet very little is known about the factors related to readmissions. Methods A Short Stay Pathway (SSP) has been introduced on the Gold Coast, Australia, for patients in acute mental health crisis with admissions of up to 3 days. Rates of readmissions within 28 days were compared for SSP patients (N = 678), and a diagnosis‐matched control group of patients from acute mental health beds (N = 1356). Demographic and clinical factors were considered as predictors of subsequent readmissions. Results Average length of stay for SSP patients was 3.4 days, compared to 7.6 days in the control group. 10.6% of SSP patients and 18.4% of the control group were readmitted within 28 days ( P < .001). For both groups, a 7‐day follow up significantly reduced readmissions ( P < .05). Indigenous patients on SSP had higher odds of readmissions than non‐Indigenous patients ( P < .05), and a diagnosis of a personality disorder increased readmission in the control group but not the SSP group ( P < .001). Discussion SSP reduced repeated hospitalizations for patients in acute crisis by 42%. An identification of factors related to future admissions can inform future tailoring of this model of care to subgroups of patients.