Premium
Systematic review of barriers and facilitators to accessing and engaging with mental health care among at‐risk young people
Author(s) -
Brown Adrienne,
Rice Simon M.,
Rickwood Debra J.,
Parker Alexandra G.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
asia‐pacific psychiatry
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.654
H-Index - 21
eISSN - 1758-5872
pISSN - 1758-5864
DOI - 10.1111/appy.12199
Subject(s) - disadvantaged , mental health , transgender , lesbian , psychology , health care , medicine , psychiatry , political science , psychoanalysis , law
This study aims to review the literature on barriers and facilitators to accessing and engaging with mental health care among young people from potentially disadvantaged groups, including young people identified as A boriginal or T orres S trait I slander ( ATSI ); culturally and linguistically diverse ( CALD ); lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, or intersex ( LGBTQI ); homeless; substance using; and youth residing in rural or remote areas. Methods Fourteen databases were searched to identify qualitative and quantitative researches that examined barriers and/or facilitators to mental health care among the six groups of potentially disadvantaged young people. Results Out of 62 studies identified, 3 were conducted with ATSI young people, 1 with CALD young people, 4 with LGBTQI young people, 14 with homeless young people, 24 with substance‐using young people, and 16 with young people residing in rural or remote areas. Findings generally confirmed barriers already established for all young people, but indicated that some may be heightened for young people in the six identified groups. Findings also pointed to both similarities and differences between these groups, suggesting that ATSI , CALD , LGBTQI , homeless, substance‐using, and rural young people have some similar needs with respect to not only mental health care, but also other needs likely to reflect their individual circumstances. Discussion This systematic review highlights that young people from potentially disadvantaged groups have distinct needs that must be recognized to improve their experiences with mental health care. Future research of good methodological quality with young people is needed to increase accessibility of, and engagement with, mental health care.