Premium
Machine learning mortality classification in clinical documentation with increased accuracy in visual‐based analyses
Author(s) -
Slattery Susan M.,
Knight Daniel C.,
WeeseMayer Debra E.,
Grobman William A.,
Downey Doug C.,
Murthy Karna
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
acta paediatrica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.772
H-Index - 115
eISSN - 1651-2227
pISSN - 0803-5253
DOI - 10.1111/apa.15109
Subject(s) - medicine , documentation , percentile , pediatrics , convolutional neural network , cohort , machine learning , artificial intelligence , emergency medicine , computer science , programming language , statistics , mathematics
Aim The role of machine learning on clinical documentation for predictive outcomes remains undefined. We aimed to compare three neural networks on inpatient providers’ notes to predict mortality in neonatal hypoxic‐ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE). Methods Using Children's Hospitals Neonatal Database, non‐anomalous neonates with HIE treated with therapeutic hypothermia were identified at a single‐centre. Data were linked with the initial seven days of documentation. Exposures were derived using the databases and applying convolutional and two recurrent neural networks. The primary outcome was mortality. The predictive accuracy and performance measures for models were determined. Results The cohort included 52 eligible infants. Most infants survived (n = 36, 69%) and 23 had severe HIE (44%). Neural networks performed above baseline and differed in their median accuracy for predicting mortality ( P = .0001): recurrent models with long short‐term memory 69% (25 th , 75 th percentile 65, 73%) and gated‐recurrent model units 65% (62, 69%) and convolutional 72% (64, 96%). Convolutional networks’ median specificity was 81% (72, 97%). Conclusion The neural network models demonstrated fundamental validity in predicting mortality using inpatient provider documentation. Convolutional models had high specificity for (excluding) mortality in neonatal HIE. These findings provide a platform for future model training and ultimately tool development to assist clinicians in patient assessments and risk stratifications.