Premium
The accuracy of delivery of target pressures using self‐inflating bag manometers in a benchtop study
Author(s) -
Rafferty Anthony R.,
Johnson Lucy,
Maxfield Dominic,
Dawson Jennifer A.,
Davis Peter G.,
Thio Marta
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
acta paediatrica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.772
H-Index - 115
eISSN - 1651-2227
pISSN - 0803-5253
DOI - 10.1111/apa.13397
Subject(s) - medicine , pressure measurement , peak inspiratory pressure , anesthesia , limits of agreement , positive pressure ventilation , tidal volume , nuclear medicine , mechanical engineering , respiratory system , engineering , respiratory failure
Aim We tested whether operators using manometers attached to self‐inflating bags could accurately deliver set targeted peak inspiratory pressures ( PIP s) compared to the Neopuff ™ T‐piece resuscitator ( TPR ). Methods Participants provided positive pressure ventilation to a leak‐free neonatal test lung at a rate of 60 inflations/min and a flow of 8 L/min. Participants used three manometers attached to self‐inflating bags and a Neopuff ™ TPR to target PIP s of 20, 30 and 40 cmH 2 O on each device. Mean PIP s delivered with each manometer were compared to the ‘gold standard’ Neopuff ™ TPR . Results In total, 13 991 inflations delivered by 20 participants were analysed. At all target PIP s, the mean PIP delivered using the Mercury Medical manometer attached to a Laerdal self‐inflating bag was significantly higher by 5 cmH 2 O (p < 0.01) than the Neopuff ™ TPR . The PIP delivered using both the Ambu ™ and Parker Healthcare manometers attached to their respective devices was similar to that delivered by the Neopuff ™ TPR at all targeted PIP s. Conclusion Accurately targeted PIP s can be achieved when a manometer specifically designed for use on a self‐inflating bag is used during manual ventilation. This may be useful in settings where access to a Neopuff ™ TPR or a gas flow source is limited.