Premium
Minimal enteral nutrition during neonatal hypothermia treatment for perinatal hypoxic‐ischaemic encephalopathy is safe and feasible
Author(s) -
Thyagarajan Balamurugan,
Tillqvist Emma,
Baral Vijay,
Hallberg Boubou,
Vollmer Brigitte,
Blennow Mats
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
acta paediatrica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.772
H-Index - 115
eISSN - 1651-2227
pISSN - 0803-5253
DOI - 10.1111/apa.12838
Subject(s) - medicine , enteral administration , hypothermia , parenteral nutrition , encephalopathy , breastfeeding , cohort , retrospective cohort study , adverse effect , interquartile range , pediatrics , anesthesia , surgery
Aim The safety and efficacy of enteral feeding during hypothermia treatment following hypoxic‐ischaemic encephalopathy has not been studied before, resulting in variations in practice. Our study compared the benefits and safety of both early minimal and delayed enteral feeding during hypothermia treatment. Methods Our retrospective cohort study, from January 2009 to December 2011, compared a Swedish cohort, who received early enteral feeding during hypothermia, and a UK cohort, who received delayed enteral feeding. Results In Sweden (n = 51), enteral feeds were initiated at a median of 23.6 h and full oral feeding was achieved at 9 days (range 3–23). In the UK (n = 34), the equivalent figures were 100 h and 8 days (range 3–13) (p = 0.01). Both groups achieved enteral feeding at a median 6 days. The median length of hospital stay was 13 days in Sweden and 10 days in the UK (p = 0.04). More babies were fully breastfeeding or breastfed and bottle‐fed at discharge in Sweden (85%) than the UK (67%) (p = 0.08). There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding adverse events. Conclusion Early minimal enteral feeding during hypothermia proved feasible, with no significant complications. Delayed enteral feeding did not affect time to full enteral feeding.