z-logo
Premium
Estimated trans‐lamina cribrosa pressure difference versus intraocular pressure as biomarker for open‐angle glaucoma. The B eijing Eye Study 2011
Author(s) -
Jonas Jost B.,
Wang Ning Li,
Wang Ya Xing,
You Qi Sheng,
Xie Xiao Bin,
Yang Di Ya,
Xu Liang
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
acta ophthalmologica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.534
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1755-3768
pISSN - 1755-375X
DOI - 10.1111/aos.12480
Subject(s) - glaucoma , medicine , intraocular pressure , ophthalmology , cerebrospinal fluid pressure , odds ratio , population , confidence interval , open angle glaucoma , cerebrospinal fluid , environmental health
Purpose To examine whether an estimated trans‐lamina cribrosa pressure difference ( TLCPD ) better than intraocular pressure ( IOP ) correlated with markers for glaucoma. Methods The population‐based B eijing E ye S tudy 2011 included 3468 individuals. Cerebrospinal fluid pressure ( CSFP ) was calculated as CSFP [mmHg] = 0.44 × Body Mass Index [kg/m 2 ] + 0.16 × Diastolic Blood Pressure [mmHg] − 0.18 × Age [Years] − 1.91. TLCPD was IOP – CSFP . Results In the non‐glaucomatous population, mean TLCPD was 5.8 ± 4.1 mmHg and mean estimated CSFP was 8.9 ± 3.7 mmHg. IOP was higher (p   =   0.008), CSFP was lower (p   <   0.001), and TLCPD was (p   <   0.001) higher in the glaucoma group than in the non‐glaucomatous group. The intergroup difference was highest for TLCPD (2.1 mmHg) followed by CSFP (1.7 mmHg) and IOP (0.4 mmHg). Open‐angle glaucoma ( OAG ) was associated with higher TLCPD [p   <   0.001; odds ratio ( OR ): 1.14; 95% confidence intervals ( CI ): 1.08, 1.19] but not with IOP (p   =   0.22; OR : 0.96; 95% CI : 0.89, 1.03). In contrast, angle‐closure glaucoma ( ACG ) was associated with higher IOP (p   =   0.03; B : 0.14; OR : 1.15; 95% CI : 1.01, 1.30) but not with TLCPD (p   =   0.98), after adjustment for age and anterior chamber depth. Retinal nerve fibre layer thickness was associated with lower TLCPD (p   =   0.036) but not with IOP (p   =   0.96), after adjusting for gender, age, region of habitation, optic disc area and refractive error. Neuroretinal area and volume were associated with smaller TLCPD (p   =   0.002, and p   <   0.001, respectively), after adjusting for gender, optic disc area and refractive error, but not with IOP (p   =   0.43 and p   =   0.25, resp.). Conclusions In OAG , but not in ACG , calculated TLCPD versus IOP showed a better association with glaucoma presence and amount of glaucomatous optic neuropathy. It supports the notion of a potential role of low CSFP in the pathogenesis of OAG .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom