Premium
Three intravitreal bevacizumab versus two intravitreal triamcinolone injections in recent onset central retinal vein occlusion
Author(s) -
Ramezani Alireza,
Esfandiari Hamed,
Entezari Morteza,
Moradian Siamak,
Soheilian Masoud,
Dehsarvi Babak,
Yaseri Mehdi
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
acta ophthalmologica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.534
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1755-3768
pISSN - 1755-375X
DOI - 10.1111/aos.12317
Subject(s) - medicine , central retinal vein occlusion , triamcinolone acetonide , intraocular pressure , ophthalmology , visual acuity , bevacizumab , acetonide , randomized controlled trial , occlusion , refractory (planetary science) , surgery , macular edema , chemotherapy , physics , astrobiology
Purpose To evaluate the effects of repeated intravitreal injections of bevacizumab ( IVB ) versus triamcinolone acetonide ( IVT ) in the treatment of acute central retinal vein occlusion ( CRVO ). Methods In this randomized clinical trial, 86 eyes with recent onset (<12 weeks) CRVO were assigned to two groups: IVB group (43 eyes) that received three monthly injections of 1.25 mg of IVB , and IVT group (43 eyes) that received two injections of 2 mg IVT 2 months apart. Outcomes were best‐corrected visual acuity ( BCVA ), central macular thickness ( CMT ), and intraocular pressure ( IOP ) changes. Results Mean BCVA improved significantly at 6 months in both groups; from 0.87 ± 0.49 to 0.41 ± 0.35 log MAR in IVB group, and from 0.81 ± 0.45 to 0.62 ± 0.48 log MAR in IVT group (p < 0.001). However, between‐group differences reach a significant level at months 4 (p = 0.003) and 6 (p < 0.001) in favour of the IVB group. In terms of CMT reduction, the difference between the groups was statistically significant (p = 0.002) at month 6. Significant differences were noted more in the ischaemic cases in favour of the IVB group. Mean IOP rise was significantly higher in the IVT group at all visits. Conclusions Both 3‐times monthly IVB injections and 2‐times IVT injections could be effective in cases with recent onset CRVO up to 6 months. However, considering the better outcomes after IVB injections and the potential complications of IVT injections, we would recommend prescheduled repeated IVB injections for such cases. The observed favourable responses were more pronounced in the ischaemic types; nevertheless, this should be confirmed in larger studies.