z-logo
Premium
Characterization of the thickness of different corneal zones in glaucoma: effect on dynamic contour, Goldmann and rebound tonometries
Author(s) -
SaenzFrances Federico,
Jañez Luis,
BorregoSanz Lara,
MartinezdelaCasa Jose Maria,
MoralesFernandez Laura,
SantosBueso Enrique,
GarciaSanchez Julian,
GarciaFeijoo Julian
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
acta ophthalmologica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.534
H-Index - 87
eISSN - 1755-3768
pISSN - 1755-375X
DOI - 10.1111/aos.12154
Subject(s) - ophthalmology , glaucoma , optometry , medicine
. Purpose:  To characterize five models of corneal thickness circular zoning in a sample of healthy controls and a sample of patients with primary open‐angle glaucoma (POAG) and to determine their effect on Goldmann (GAT), dynamic contour (DCT) and rebound tonometers (RT). Methods:  The study participants were 122 controls and 129 cases. Five corneal thickness zoning models (A, B, C, D and E) were constructed. The partitioning pattern consisted of a circle centred at the corneal apex and several concentric rings, until the limbus; the contours of each ring followed the geometry of the corneal contour of each participant. In Model A, the central circle was 1 mm in diameter and five concentric rings were established. Mean was obtained for each zone for both samples and compared between them using a t‐test. The effect on the tonometers of central cornel thickness (CCT) and mean thickness of the zones generated was determined through several linear regression models (one per tonometer and per sample). Results:  According to a t ‐test, cases and controls differ in zones I [mean difference (MD): 17.93 μm], V (MD: 25.52 μm) and VI (MD: 31.78 μm) of model A (higher values in the cases sample). RT was affected by CCT (controls: B  = 0.089; cases: B  = 0.081). DCT was affected by zone IV of model A (controls: B  = −0.029; cases: B  = −0.012). GAT was affected by CCT (controls: B  = 0.043; cases: B  = 0.025) and zone III of model A (controls: B  = −0.045; cases: B  = −0.033). Conclusion:  Our results highlight the importance of the thickness of other regions of the cornea different from its main centre in discriminating between healthy controls and patients with POAG and in IOP measurements made using DCT, GAT and RT.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here