Clinical Outcomes of Patients Treated With Pulmonary Vasodilators Early and in High Dose After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Right ventricular failure ( RVF ) is common after left ventricular assist device ( LVAD ) implantation and a major determinant of adverse outcomes. Optimal perioperative right ventricular ( RV ) management is not well defined. We evaluated the use of pulmonary vasodilator therapy during LVAD implantation. We performed a retrospective analysis of continuous‐flow LVAD implants and pulmonary vasodilator use at our institution between S eptember 2004 and J une 2013. Preoperative RVF risk was assessed using recognized variables. Sixty‐five patients (80% men, 50 ± 14 years) were included: 52% HeartWare ventricular assist device ( HVAD ), 11% HeartMate II ( HMII ), 17% VentrAssist, 20% Jarvik. Predicted RVF risk was comparable with contemporary LVAD populations: 8% ventilated, 14% mechanical support, 86% inotropes, 25% BUN >39 mg/dL, 23% bilirubin ≥2 mg/dL, 31% RV : LV (left ventricular) diameter ≥0.75, 27% RA : PCWP (right atrium : pulmonary capillary wedge pressure) >0.63, 36% RV stroke work index <6 gm‐m/m 2 /beat. The majority (91%) received pulmonary vasodilators early and in high dose: 72% nitric oxide, 77% sildenafil (max 200 ± 79 mg/day), 66% iloprost (max 126 ± 37 μg/day). Median hospital stay was 26 (21) days. No patient required RV mechanical support. Of six (9%) patients meeting RVF criteria based on prolonged need for inotropes, four were transplanted, one is alive with an LVAD at 3 years, and one died on day 35 of intracranial hemorrhage. Two‐year survival was 77% (92% for HMII / HVAD ): transplanted 54%, alive with LVAD 21%, recovery/explanted 2%. A low incidence of RVF and excellent outcomes were observed for patients treated early during LVAD implantation with combination, high‐dose pulmonary vasodilators. The results warrant further investigation in a randomized controlled study.