z-logo
Premium
Elective Use of Intra‐Aortic Balloon Pump During Aortic Valve Replacement in Elderly Patients to Reduce Postoperative Cardiac Complications
Author(s) -
Nakahira Junko,
Sawai Toshiyuki,
Minami Toshiaki
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
artificial organs
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.684
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1525-1594
pISSN - 0160-564X
DOI - 10.1111/aor.12207
Subject(s) - medicine , intra aortic balloon pump , cardiology , aortic valve replacement , odds ratio , stenosis , cardiac surgery , aortic valve stenosis , valve replacement , surgery , intra aortic balloon pumping , myocardial infarction , cardiogenic shock
This is a retrospective cohort study to determine if routine intra‐aortic balloon pump ( IABP ) placement prior to aortic valve replacement in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis without significant coronary artery stenosis reduces cardiac complications. Participants were patients aged ≥70 years without significant coronary stenosis, who had severe aortic stenosis, and were undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement. Our primary endpoint was postoperative cardiac morbidity rate as a composite of the adverse cardiac events: elevated creatine kinase with muscle and brain subunits ( CK ‐ MB )/ CK (>5%), fatal ventricular arrhythmias requiring therapy, or catecholamine index of >10. Eighteen patients had elective IABP insertion prior to surgery, and 16 patients had no planned IABP insertion. One patient died (5.6%) in the elective IABP group ( P  = 1.0 compared with the non‐ IABP group). The overall rate of in‐hospital death was 2.9% (1/34). In the non‐ IABP group, one patient had rescue IABP insertion after surgery (6.3%). The elective IABP group had a significantly lower cardiac morbidity rate than the non‐IABP group (44.4 vs. 87.5%, respectively, P  = 0.013). According to multivariate analysis using a logistic European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation value of >10% to define increased morbidity, elective IABP use significantly reduced cardiac morbidity (odds ratio, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.02–0.67; P  = 0.016). Additionally, the elective IABP group was more likely to show low CK ‐ MB / CK than the non‐ IABP group (4.1 ± 1.9% vs. 6.1 ± 3.1%, respectively, P  = 0.026). We concluded that among elderly aortic valve replacement patients without significant coronary artery stenosis, elective IABP use may reduce the incidence of major adverse cardiac events.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here