Open AccessAssessment of the cervix in pregnant women with a history of cervical insufficiency during the first trimester using elastography
Author(s) -
Chen ChenYu,
Chen ChiePein,
Sun FangJu
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
acta obstetricia et gynecologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.401
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1600-0412
pISSN - 0001-6349
DOI - 10.1111/aogs.13942
Subject(s) - cervical insufficiency , medicine , cervical canal , cervix , odds ratio , gynecology , obstetrics , confidence interval , cancer
To investigate changes in first trimester cervical elastography, cervical length and endocervical canal width in pregnant women with a history of cervical insufficiency, and further discuss the possibility of using these markers as predictors of cervical insufficiency in early pregnancy. Material and methods This was an observational ultrasound study of first trimester cervical changes in singleton pregnancies between January 2016 and June 2018. Cervical elastography, cervical length and endocervical canal width were measured during the first trimester. Strain elastography was used to estimate the softness of anterior and posterior cervical lips and was expressed as percentages (strain rate). Results Of the 339 pregnant women enrolled, 24 had a history of cervical insufficiency. The anterior cervical lip was significantly softer in the cervical insufficiency group (strain rate: 0.19% ± 0.05% vs 0.11% ± 0.04%; P < .001). Cervical length was significantly shorter in the cervical insufficiency group (36.3 ± 4.8 mm vs 38.3 ± 3.8 mm; P = .014). Endocervical canal width was significantly wider in the cervical insufficiency group (5.7 ± 1.1 mm vs 5.2 ± 0.7 mm; P = .001). Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses revealed that the optimal cut‐off values of anterior cervical lip, cervical length and endocervical canal width to confirm the diagnosis of cervical insufficiency were 0.15%, 35.5 mm and 5.75 mm, respectively. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, significant differences were still observed in anterior cervical strain rate (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 53.78, 95% [confidence interval [CI] 11‐270; P < .001) and endocervical canal width (adjusted OR, 5.41, 95% CI,1.2‐24.7; P = .029). Conclusions First trimester cervical elastography is a valuable tool in the assessment of women with a history of cervical insufficiency. The anterior cervical lip was significantly softer in women with a history of cervical insufficiency, and the sensitivity and specificity of anterior cervical lip strain were better than that of cervical length and endocervical canal width.