
Placental location and pregnancy outcomes in nulliparous women: A population‐based cohort study
Author(s) -
Granfors Michaela,
Stephansson Olof,
Endler Margit,
Jonsson Maria,
Sandström Anna,
Wikström AnnaKarin
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
acta obstetricia et gynecologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.401
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1600-0412
pISSN - 0001-6349
DOI - 10.1111/aogs.13578
Subject(s) - medicine , obstetrics , gynecology , pregnancy , cohort study , population , cohort , genetics , environmental health , biology
The impact of placenta previa on pregnancy, delivery and infant outcomes has been extensively studied. However, less is known about the possible association of placental location other than previa with pregnancy outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate if placental location other than previa is associated with adverse pregnancy, delivery and infant outcomes. Material and methods This is a population‐based cohort study, with data from the regional population‐based Stockholm‐Gotland Obstetric Cohort, Sweden, from 2008 to 2014. The study population included 74 087 nulliparous women with singleton pregnancies resulting in live‐born infants, with information about placental location from the second‐trimester ultrasound screening. The association between placental location (fundal, lateral, anterior or posterior) and pregnancy outcomes was estimated using logistic regression analysis. Odds ratios ( OR ) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI ) were calculated, and adjustments were made for maternal age, height, country of birth, smoking in early pregnancy, sex of the infant and in vitro fertilization. Main outcome measures were pregnancy, delivery and infant outcomes. Results Compared with posterior placental location, fundal and lateral placental locations were associated with a number of adverse pregnancy outcomes, the most important being: very preterm birth (<32 weeks of gestation) (adjusted OR [ aOR ] 1.78, 95% CI 1.18‐2.63 and aOR 2.12, 95% CI 1.39‐2.25, respectively), moderate preterm birth (32‐36 weeks of gestation) ( aOR 1.23, 95% CI 1.001‐1.51 and aOR 1.62, 95% CI 1.32‐2.00, respectively), small‐for‐gestational‐age birth ( aOR 1.67, 95% CI 1.34‐2.07 and aOR 1.77, 95% CI 1.39‐2.25, respectively) and manual removal of the placenta in vaginal births ( aOR 3.27, 95% CI 2.68‐3.99 and aOR 3.27, 95% CI 2.60‐4.10, respectively). Additionally, lateral placental location was associated with preeclampsia ( aOR 1.30, 95% CI 1.03‐1.65) and severe postpartum hemorrhage ( aOR 1.42, 95% CI 1.27‐1.82). Conclusions Compared with posterior placental location, fundal and lateral placental locations are associated with a number of adverse pregnancy, delivery and infant outcomes.