
Oncologists' and pediatric oncologists' perspectives and challenges for fertility preservation
Author(s) -
Lampic Claudia,
Wettergren Lena
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
acta obstetricia et gynecologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.401
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1600-0412
pISSN - 0001-6349
DOI - 10.1111/aogs.13551
Subject(s) - fertility , fertility preservation , medicine , psychological intervention , competence (human resources) , family medicine , oncofertility , health care , nursing , psychology , population , environmental health , social psychology , economics , economic growth
International guidelines recommend that health‐care providers initiate discussions about the impact of treatment on fertility with cancer patients of reproductive age, or with parents/legal guardians of children, as early as possible in the treatment process. Still, both physicians and patients confirm that this is not always the case. This literature review summarizes findings regarding oncologists' and pediatric oncologists' perspectives and challenges of providing fertility preservation care, and points out directions for development. The results concerning the challenges facing clinicians are consistent and encompass both internal and external factors. The internal factors relate to clinicians' characteristics and values and include their knowledge of fertility preservation, clinical experience, perceptions of patients' plans for children, and how comfortable they are to discuss sensitive issues. The external factors relate to the availability of health‐care services and the organization of care, including the clinicians' working conditions. Several strategies to overcome identified challenges for clinicians to provide high‐quality fertility preservation care are proposed. These include educational interventions to increase clinicians' knowledge about treatment‐induced fertility impairment and available fertility preservation measures, as well as interventions aimed to increase clinicians' readiness and competence to communicate with patients and their parents. In addition, different types of educational resources for patients have been suggested to improve patient‐provider communication about fertility preservation, such as age‐appropriate brochures and decision aids. Organizational approaches suggested to address the identified external factors include development and implementation of policies and guidelines as well as closer collaboration between oncological and fertility clinics. Also, modifications of electronic medical record systems may support clinicians by prompting the documentation of discussions about potential treatment impact on future fertility and about available fertility preservation options. The development and implementation of multifaceted oncofertility programs appears to be a promising way forward towards high‐quality fertility preservation care meeting patients' needs.