Open AccessPlacenta, cord and membranes: a dual center validation study of midwives’ classifications and notifications to the Medical Birth Registry of Norway
Author(s) -
Sunde Ingvild Dahl,
Vekseth Christina,
Rasmussen Svein,
Mahjoob Elham,
Collett Karin,
Ebbing Cathrine
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
acta obstetricia et gynecologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.401
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1600-0412
pISSN - 0001-6349
DOI - 10.1111/aogs.13164
Subject(s) - medicine , placenta , cord , kappa , obstetrics , umbilical cord , birth weight , pregnancy , fetus , surgery , anatomy , linguistics , genetics , philosophy , biology
A validation of data regarding the placenta, cord and membranes in Medical Birth Registry of Norway ( MBRN ) is lacking. Here we investigate the inter‐ and intra‐observer agreement of observations regarding the placenta, cord and membranes to the MBRN in two institutions. Material and methods We conducted a dual center validation study of data regarding placenta, cord and membranes. In the inter‐observer study, 196 placentas in two institutions were examined by the attending midwife and a blinded colleague, whereas in the intra‐observer study registrations by the attending midwife on 195 placentas were compared with her own registrations to the MBRN . In a separate sample consisting of 51 placental pathology reports, midwives’ registrations to the MBRN were compared with the pathology report. For categorical and continuous variables, agreement was assessed by kappa value and paired sample t‐test, respectively. Results Inter‐observer agreement between two midwives for cord insertion site and bi‐placenta, cord knots and vessel anomalies were good (kappa values >0.79 and >0.96, respectively). The inter‐ and intra‐observer study showed no significant differences regarding placental weight and cord length ( p = 0.31 and 0.28, p = 0.71 and 0.39, respectively). The inter‐observer agreement between the pathology reports and midwives’ registrations was good for gross placental and cord variants (kappa 0.73–1.0), but there were significant differences in placental weight and cord length ( p < 0.0001). Conclusions The results suggest that the validity of data regarding placenta and cord in the MBRN is sufficiently high to justify future large‐scale epidemiologic research based on this database.