Open AccessOutcome of attempted vaginal delivery after a previous vacuum extraction: a population‐based study
Author(s) -
Elvander Charlotte,
Cnattingius Sven
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
acta obstetricia et gynecologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.401
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1600-0412
pISSN - 0001-6349
DOI - 10.1111/aogs.12824
Subject(s) - medicine , vacuum extraction , vaginal delivery , obstetrics , population , gestational age , cephalic presentation , pregnancy , gynecology , relative risk , confidence interval , genetics , environmental health , biology
Few studies have investigated long‐term effects of a first vaginal instrumental delivery on subsequent mode of delivery. We investigated risks of repeat vacuum extraction and risk factors associated with a repeat vacuum extraction delivery. Material and methods This is a population‐based register study including 391 160 women with two consecutive singleton term (≥37 weeks) live births in cephalic presentation between/within the time period of 1992–2010 in Sweden. Rates and risk ratios of mode of delivery in second pregnancy in relation to primary mode of delivery were calculated using descriptive analyses and generalized linear models. Risk of repeat vacuum extraction was adjusted for maternal age and height, interpregnancy interval, gestational length, birthweight, induction, sex and occiput posterior position. Results Compared with women with a primary spontaneous vaginal delivery, women with a primary vacuum extraction had an almost five‐fold risk of vacuum extraction delivery and nearly a three‐fold risk of emergency cesarean section at second delivery. For women with a primary emergency cesarean section, corresponding risks were substantially higher. Risk factors for a repeat vacuum extraction were increasing maternal age and an interpregnancy interval >4 years, decreasing maternal stature, increasing gestation length and birthweight, induction, giving birth to a male infant and occiput posterior position. Conclusions Nine of ten women who attempted a vaginal birth after a primary vacuum extraction succeeded in having a spontaneous vaginal delivery at second delivery. Compared with women with a primary spontaneous vaginal delivery, women with a primary vacuum extraction were at increased risk of repeat vacuum extraction and emergency cesarean section in subsequent delivery although their risk was not as high as that of women with a primary emergency cesarean section.