Open AccessDiscrepancy in term calculation from second trimester ultrasound scan versus last menstrual period in women with type 1 diabetes
Author(s) -
Eidem Ingvild,
Vangen Siri,
Henriksen Tore,
Vollset Stein E.,
Hanssen Kristian F.,
Joner Geir,
Stene Lars C.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
acta obstetricia et gynecologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.401
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1600-0412
pISSN - 0001-6349
DOI - 10.1111/aogs.12422
Subject(s) - medicine , obstetrics , gestational diabetes , pregnancy , type 2 diabetes , population , norwegian , diabetes mellitus , gestational age , gynecology , gestation , endocrinology , linguistics , philosophy , environmental health , biology , genetics
Objective To study differences in ultrasound‐based compared to menstrual‐based term estimation in women with type 1 diabetes. Design Nationwide register study. Setting Norway. Population Deliveries in Norway 1999–2004 by women registered in the Norwegian Childhood Diabetes Registry ( n = 342) and the background population ( n = 307 248), with data on both ultrasound‐based and menstrual‐based gestational age notified in the Birth Registry of Norway. Births with major malformations were excluded. Methods Linkage of two nationwide registries, the Medical Birth Registry of Norway and the Norwegian Childhood Diabetes Registry. Main outcome measures Estimated gestational age at delivery based on routine second trimester ultrasound measurements and last menstrual period. Results In women with type 1 diabetes, the distribution of gestational age at delivery was shifted considerably towards a lower gestational age when using second trimester ultrasound data for estimation, compared with last menstrual period data. The difference between the two estimation methods was larger among women with type 1 diabetes, although also evident in the general population. One in four women with diabetes and a certain last menstrual period date had their ultrasound‐calculated term postponed 1 week or more, while one in 10 had it postponed 2 weeks or more. Corresponding numbers in the background population were one in five and one in 20. Conclusions We found a systematic postponement of ultrasound‐based compared with menstrual‐based term estimation in women with type 1 diabetes. Relying solely on routine ultrasound‐based term calculation for delivery decision may imply a risk of going beyond an optimal pregnancy length.