Lidocaine‐prilocaine ( EMLA ® ) cream as analgesia in hysteroscopy practice: a prospective, randomized, non‐blinded, controlled study
Author(s) -
Arnau Baldomero,
Jovell Esther,
Redón Stephanie,
Canals Marta,
Mir Vanessa,
Jiménez Elena
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
acta obstetricia et gynecologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.401
H-Index - 102
eISSN - 1600-0412
pISSN - 0001-6349
DOI - 10.1111/aogs.12165
Subject(s) - medicine , lidocaine , prilocaine , visual analogue scale , hysteroscopy , anesthesia , randomized controlled trial , placebo , pain score , prospective cohort study , surgery , alternative medicine , pathology
We investigated the efficacy of 5% lidocaine 25 mg–prilocaine 25 mg/g cream ( EMLA ® ) applied to the uterine cervix for reducing pain during diagnostic or operative hysteroscopy, using a visual analogue scale ( VAS ) for pain in a prospective randomized, non‐blinded, controlled study in 92 successive patients. Patients were randomized to either 3 mL of EMLA cream or 3 mL of ultrasound gel (placebo), placed endocervically and exocervically, 10 min before hysteroscopy. Intensity of pain was evaluated immediately after the procedure using a 10‐cm VAS . No differences were found between the two groups ( p = 0.07). The number of women who wished to stop the procedure was significantly lower in the EMLA group compared with the control group ( p = 0.013). We concluded that topical instillation of EMLA does not decrease pain during hysteroscopy, but does reduce a desire to abandon the procedure.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom