
Effects of dietary Camelina sativa products on digestible nutrient compositions for rainbow trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss )
Author(s) -
Fraser J.M.,
Collins S.A.,
Chen Z.,
Tibbetts S.M.,
Lall S.P.,
Anderson D.M.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
aquaculture nutrition
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.941
H-Index - 79
eISSN - 1365-2095
pISSN - 1353-5773
DOI - 10.1111/anu.12465
Subject(s) - camelina , camelina sativa , rainbow trout , nutrient , food science , biology , ingredient , meal , chemistry , agronomy , fish <actinopterygii> , fishery , ecology , crop
Two trials were conducted to determine the effect of dietary inclusion of camelina ( Camelina sativa ) products on their digestible nutrient compositions in rainbow trout. In the first experiment, the following camelina products: full‐fat seed, oil, high‐oil residue meal ( HORM ), pre‐press solvent‐extracted meal ( SECM ) and toasted SECM were evaluated. In the second trial, the utilization of SECM , SECM soaked in water ( WS ), SECM treated with a multicarbohydrase, Superzyme™‐ OM , SECM treated with Bio‐Phytase and SECM treated with Superzyme™‐ OM and Bio‐Phytase ( MIX ) was determined. The experimental diets consisted of a basal diet and test ingredient with a ratio of 70:30, except for camelina oil where the ratio was 80:20. In Experiment 1, SECM had the highest level of digestible crude protein (352 g kg −1 ), whereas the oil was the best source of digestible energy (8,063 kcal kg −1 ) and digestible crude fat (908 g kg −1 ). In Experiment 2, there were no significant differences in nutrient digestibility of SECM and HORM ; however, WS and MIX had significantly more digestible dry matter and digestible crude fat than SECM and HORM . Camelina by‐products have the potential to replace fishery by‐products in rainbow trout feeds.