Premium
From Grenfell Tower to the Home Front: Unsettling Property Norms Using a Genealogical Approach
Author(s) -
Burgum Samuel
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
antipode
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.177
H-Index - 98
eISSN - 1467-8330
pISSN - 0066-4812
DOI - 10.1111/anti.12495
Subject(s) - property (philosophy) , entitlement (fair division) , politics , government (linguistics) , sociology , action (physics) , front (military) , face (sociological concept) , law and economics , law , political science , political economy , economics , epistemology , social science , linguistics , philosophy , physics , mathematical economics , quantum mechanics , mechanical engineering , engineering
The Grenfell fire was symbolic of an unequal urban landscape closely tied to material and aesthetic norms around property ownership and entitlement. The aim of this paper is to unsettle these norms by advancing a novel genealogical approach. Through systematic review of government archives seldom studied by property researchers, historical comparisons are mobilised to challenge the taken‐for‐granted way in which we approach property and ownership today. It is shown how, in the face of a comparable housing crisis and direct action, both Churchill's and Atlee's post‐war governments temporarily overlooked property norms by extending wartime requisitioning powers. Going further, however, the paper argues that by revisiting history, we can also rediscover a legacy of “forced entry” that might open up political possibilities in the present. By advancing a genealogical approach to ownership, the paper contributes to wider discussions around property norms, concluding that we have before (and can again) enact property differently.