Premium
Influence of positive margins on tumour recurrence and overall survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer
Author(s) -
Juez Luz Divina,
Barranquero Alberto G.,
Priego Pablo,
Cuadrado Marta,
Blázquez Luis,
SánchezPicot Silvia,
FernándezCebrián José María,
Galindo Julio
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
anz journal of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.426
H-Index - 70
eISSN - 1445-2197
pISSN - 1445-1433
DOI - 10.1111/ans.16937
Subject(s) - medicine , hazard ratio , gastrectomy , stage (stratigraphy) , resection margin , cancer , confidence interval , surgical margin , multivariate analysis , gastroenterology , incidence (geometry) , surgery , proportional hazards model , stomach , resection , paleontology , physics , optics , biology
Background Incidence of positive surgical margins after curative gastrectomy ranges from 1% to 20%. It has been suggested that positive surgical margin is an adverse prognosis factor, with a higher local recurrence and worse overall survival (OS). However, the management of these patients remains unclear. Methods A total of 267 patients who underwent gastrectomy with curative intent between January 2010 and December 2018 in our centre were enrolled in this study. Post‐operative histological analysis revealed positive resection margins in 18 patients (8%). Clinicopathological features and outcome of patients undergoing gastrectomy with negative and positive margins were compared. Results Patients with positive margins were associated with higher American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, T stage, N stage, median number of positive nodes, diffuse Lauren type, whole stomach involved and poorly differentiated tumours. Local recurrence was described in 50% of cases with positive margins. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that the TNM stage was the only independent prognostic factor associated with recurrence. OS for positive margins at 1, 3 and 5 years was 75%, 57% and 26%, respectively. The median survival in patients with positive margins was 38.33 versus 81.17 months for R0 patients ( p = 0.027). Multivariate analysis showed that age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.041, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02–1.07, sex (HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.22–3.30) and TNM stage ( p < 0.001) were independent factors of OS. Conclusion Positive resection margin was an indication of advanced and more aggressive disease rather than an independent prognosis factor for OS or recurrence in gastric cancer.