z-logo
Premium
Reducing inflow occlusion, occlusion duration and blood loss during hepatic resections
Author(s) -
Huo Ya Ruth,
Shiraev Tim,
Alzahrani Nayef,
Chu Francis
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
anz journal of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.426
H-Index - 70
eISSN - 1445-2197
pISSN - 1445-1433
DOI - 10.1111/ans.13711
Subject(s) - medicine , occlusion , blood loss , surgery , blood transfusion , vascular occlusion , anesthesia
Background To assess the changes in blood loss during hepatic resection with improved haemostatic devices such as a bipolar sealing device and a topical haemostatic agent. Methods This retrospective clinical study of prospectively collected data will assess hepatic resections performed by a single surgeon between 2005 and 2013, with the introduction of the two haemostatic techniques in 2009. Results A total of 371 hepatic resections (214 from 2005 to 2008 and 157 from 2009 to 2013) were included in this study. Compared with the conventional hepatic resection (2005–2008), the use of haemostatic techniques (2009–2013) significantly reduced the need for inflow occlusion ( OR : 0.37, 95% CI : 0.24–0.57, P < 0.001), overall occlusion time (20.8 min versus 25.9 min, P = 0.04) and transfusion requirement (4.6% versus 12%, OR : 0.35, 95% CI : 0.14–0.90, P = 0.02). Mean overall blood loss was reduced post‐2009; however, the decrease was not statistically different (401.3 mL versus 470.8 mL , P = 0.27). Subgroup analysis revealed that blood loss was more than halved post‐2009 compared with pre‐2009 for patients who received pre‐operative chemotherapy (324.6 mL versus 738.5 mL , P = 0.005). Conclusion The use of a bipolar sealing device and a topical haemostatic agent reduces the need for inflow occlusion, overall occlusion time and transfusions in all patients compared with conventional hepatic resections.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here