Premium
Pre‐emptive epidural analgesia improves post‐operative pain and immune function in patients undergoing thoracotomy
Author(s) -
Yang Chengzhi,
Chang Hao,
Zhang Tiewa,
Liang Chao,
Li Enyou
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
anz journal of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.426
H-Index - 70
eISSN - 1445-2197
pISSN - 1445-1433
DOI - 10.1111/ans.12746
Subject(s) - medicine , ropivacaine , analgesic , visual analogue scale , anesthesia , thoracotomy , nausea , vomiting , group b , surgery
Background Pre‐emptive analgesia may relieve post‐operative pain. However, its effects on immune function of patients undergoing thoracotomy are still unclear. Therefore, we investigated effects of pre‐emptive epidural analgesia on post‐operative pain and immune function in patients undergoing thoracotomy. Methods Ninety patients undergoing thoracotomy were randomized equally into three groups. Group A (control) only received patient‐controlled epidural analgesia ( PCEA ). Group B (routine) was given 0.125% ropivacaine 6 mL 30 min after surgery, then PCEA . Group C (pre‐emptive) received 0.125% ropivacaine 6 mL 30 min before skin incision and every 60 min during surgery, then PCEA . Visual analogue scale scores and cytokine levels were the main outcomes. Secondary outcomes included analgesic demands, side effects and hospital stays. Results Post‐operative visual analogue scale scores were decreased in group C compared with group B, and that of group B were lower than in group A ( P < 0.05). Compared with group B, protein and mRNA expressions of tumour necrosis factor‐α, interleukin ( IL )‐6 and IL ‐8 were decreased, and that of IL ‐4 were increased in group C ( P = 0.002∼0.049). Both analgesic demands and the incidences of nausea/vomiting and hypotension were lower in group C compared with group B ( P = 0.01∼0.037). Hospital stays were shorter in group C compared with group B ( P = 0.045). Conclusions These findings suggest that pre‐emptive epidural analgesia can produce better analgesia effects, with less analgesic demands and side effects, and attenuate the surgery‐induced immune alterations, and improve the post‐operative recovery in patients undergoing thoracotomy.