Premium
Long‐term follow‐up of last autogenous option arm vein bypass
Author(s) -
Robinson Domenic R.,
Varcoe Ramon L.,
Chee Wilson,
Subramaniam Peter S.,
Benveniste Glen L.,
Fitridge Robert A.
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
anz journal of surgery
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.426
H-Index - 70
eISSN - 1445-2197
pISSN - 1445-1433
DOI - 10.1111/ans.12111
Subject(s) - medicine , surgery , vein
Abstract Background The superiority of autogenous conduits in infrainguinal bypass surgery is well established. At our institution, arm vein is utilized as the last autogenous option for infrainguinal bypass surgery. The aim of this study was to review the long‐term outcomes of last autogenous option arm vein bypass. Methods All infrainguinal arm vein bypasses performed between 1997 and 2005 by T he Q ueen E lizabeth H ospital vascular surgeons were identified. Patency, reintervention, limb salvage and survival were calculated using the K aplan– M eier survival estimate method. Results Thirty‐eight arm vein bypasses were performed in 35 patients. Eighty‐nine per cent were performed for critical limb ischaemia. Median follow‐up was 58 months (range 2–121). Twelve‐month primary, assisted primary and secondary patency rates were 52%, 73% and 76%, respectively. Three‐year primary, assisted primary and secondary patency rates were 32%, 61% and 63%, respectively. Five‐year primary, assisted primary and secondary patency rates were 21%, 47% and 49%, respectively. Patency was superior in single compared with spliced vein grafts ( P < 0.05). Limb salvage rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 94%, 87% and 76%, respectively. Patient survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 92%, 68% and 49%, respectively. Discussion Infrainguinal bypass surgery with arm vein can be performed safely with favourable patency and high rates of limb salvage. Secondary interventions to maintain patency are common and we recommend a vigilant surveillance programme to identify the threatened graft.