
Impact of P‐wave indices in prediction of atrial fibrillation—Insight from loop recorder analysis
Author(s) -
Kreimer Fabienne,
Aweimer Assem,
Pflaumbaum Andreas,
Mügge Andreas,
Gotzmann Michael
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
annals of noninvasive electrocardiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.494
H-Index - 48
eISSN - 1542-474X
pISSN - 1082-720X
DOI - 10.1111/anec.12854
Subject(s) - medicine , atrial fibrillation , implantable loop recorder , confidence interval , hazard ratio , cardiology
Background Several P‐wave indices are associated with the development of atrial fibrillation (AF). However, previous studies have been limited in their ability to reliably diagnose episodes of AF. Implantable loop recorders allow long‐term, continuous, and therefore more reliable detection of AF. Hypothesis The aim of this study is to identify and evaluate ECG parameters for predicting AF by analyzing patients with loop recorders. Methods This study included 366 patients (mean age 62 ± 16 years, mean LVEF 61 ± 6%, 175 women) without AF who underwent loop recorder implantation between 2010–2020. Patients were followed up on a 3 monthly outpatient interval. Results During a follow‐up of 627 ± 409 days, 75 patients (20%) reached the primary study end point (first detection of AF). Independent predictors of AF were as follows: age ≥68 years (hazard risk [HR], 2.66; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.668–4.235; p < .001), P‐wave amplitude in II <0.1 mV (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.298–3.441; p = .003), P‐wave terminal force in V 1 ≤ −4000 µV × ms (HR, 5.3; 95% CI, 3.249–8.636; p < .001, and advanced interatrial block (HR, 5.01; 95% CI, 2.638–9.528; p < .001). Our risk stratification model based on these independent predictors separated patients into 4 groups with high (70%), intermediate high (41%), intermediate low (18%), and low (4%) rates of AF. Conclusions Our study indicated that P‐wave indices are suitable for predicting AF episodes. Furthermore, it is possible to stratify patients into risk groups for AF using simple ECG parameters, which is particularly important for patients with cryptogenic stroke.