Premium
Prehospital stroke scales and large vessel occlusion: A systematic review
Author(s) -
Vidale S.,
Agostoni E.
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
acta neurologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.967
H-Index - 95
eISSN - 1600-0404
pISSN - 0001-6314
DOI - 10.1111/ane.12908
Subject(s) - medicine , stroke (engine) , meta analysis , medline , emergency medical services , emergency medicine , aphasia , neglect , physical medicine and rehabilitation , physical therapy , psychiatry , mechanical engineering , political science , law , engineering
Background and purpose Time sensitivity for pharmacological and mechanical arterial recanalization in acute ischemic stroke influences the choice of the reference hospital. The accurate selection and identification of patients with high probability of a large vessel occlusion ( LVO ) in the prehospital setting improve the rationalization of the transport in the more suitable centers. Aim of this analysis was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of prehospital stroke scales detecting LVO . Material and methods Studies were searched into MEDLINE , EMBASE , and CINHAL databases between January 1990 and September 2017. Principal measurements of the meta‐analysis were the overall accuracy level, sensitivity, and specificity of prehospital stroke scales. Results Nineteen scoring systems were included in the analysis coming from 13 studies. A total of 9824 patients were considered. Although a higher heterogeneity was observed in the analysis, three scores showed better results in predicting a LVO (the stroke Vision, Aphasia, Neglect assessment, the National Institute of Health Stroke scale and the Los Angeles Motor Scale). We observed significant differences of overall accuracy only for scores including hemineglect as cortical neurological sign ( P < .05). Conclusions This meta‐analysis suggests that some prehospital scoring systems including cortical signs showed better accuracy to predict stroke due to LVO . However, the assessment of these signs could be difficult to investigate by paramedics and personnel of Emergency Medical Services, and for this reason, further prospective evaluations are needed.