z-logo
Premium
Different fates of excessive daytime sleepiness: survival analysis for remission
Author(s) -
Kim T.,
Lee J. H.,
Lee C. S.,
Yoon I. Y.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
acta neurologica scandinavica
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.967
H-Index - 95
eISSN - 1600-0404
pISSN - 0001-6314
DOI - 10.1111/ane.12504
Subject(s) - narcolepsy , multiple sleep latency test , polysomnography , excessive daytime sleepiness , medicine , cataplexy , pediatrics , epworth sleepiness scale , retrospective cohort study , log rank test , survival analysis , sleep onset latency , sleep disorder , physical therapy , insomnia , psychiatry , modafinil , apnea
Background Excessive daytime sleepiness ( EDS ) is a symptom frequently presented in sleep clinics. Only a paucity of data has addressed clinical courses of sleep disorders with EDS . Therefore, we sought to compare clinical outcomes of patients presenting EDS . Methods A retrospective observational study was performed in the setting of sleep laboratory and outpatient department in a university hospital. One hundred and eight patients who presented EDS underwent polysomnography and multiple sleep latency test. Each patient was diagnosed as one of the following four categories: (1) narcolepsy with cataplexy (N + C; n = 29); (2) narcolepsy without cataplexy (N − C; n = 22); (3) idiopathic hypersomnia ( IH ; n = 24); and (4) subjective hypersomnolence ( SH ; n = 33) with mean sleep latency >8 min. Remission of EDS and treatment response were determined based on clinical evaluation. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed. Results Remission rates were significantly different ( P < 0.001, overall log‐rank test) among four groups except those between N − C and IH ( P = 0.489). While N + C showed no remission, predicted remission rates of N − C and IH group were 44.6% at 5 years and 32.5% at 5.5 years after diagnosis. The predicted remission rate of SH group was 71.7% at 3 years after diagnosis. Conclusions The similarity of clinical courses between N − C and IH suggests that N − C may be more related to IH compared to N + C. Considering different clinical courses among EDS patients, thorough evaluation of EDS should be warranted before starting treatment.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here