Premium
Vitamin D status is not associated with reproductive parameters in young Spanish men
Author(s) -
Rudnicka A.,
Adoamnei E.,
NogueraVelasco J. A.,
Vioque J.,
CañizaresHernández F.,
Mendiola J.,
Jørgensen N.,
Chavarro J. E.,
Swan S. H.,
TorresCantero A. M.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
andrology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.947
H-Index - 43
eISSN - 2047-2927
pISSN - 2047-2919
DOI - 10.1111/andr.12690
Subject(s) - semen quality , semen , sperm , vitamin d and neurology , testosterone (patch) , physiology , semen analysis , confounding , hormone , medicine , sperm motility , endocrinology , biology , infertility , andrology , pregnancy , genetics
Abstract Background Relatively low sperm count was reported among young Spanish men in 2013. Several potential culprits have been suggested as explanations for reported trends in sperm counts in Western men, including lifestyles. Although controversial, some studies suggest that semen parameters, such as low sperm motility or abnormal morphology, may be associated with low serum vitamin D levels. Objectives To evaluate associations between semen parameters and reproductive hormones and serum 25‐hydroxyvitamin D (25 OHD ) status in young Spanish men and to examine these associations in relation to dietary intake of vitamin D. Materials and methods This cross‐sectional study includes 198 university students recruited in 2010–2011 in southern Spain, who provided samples of blood and semen and food frequencies. Semen quality was evaluated by measuring volume, concentration, sperm counts, motility, and morphology, according to the WHO guidelines. Serum samples were analyzed for total 25 OHD and reproductive hormones, including FSH , LH , testosterone, inhibin B, and estradiol. Dietary vitamin D intake was assessed using a validated food frequency questionnaire. Associations with semen quality and reproductive hormones were examined using linear regression, adjusting for potential confounders. Results Almost all men had adequate levels of serum vitamin D ‐ only three men (1.5%) were vitamin D deficient (<30 nmol/L) and 17% were insufficient (<50 nmol/L). However, dietary vitamin D intakes were relatively low (below recommended 600 IU /day in 99% of men). Neither dietary intake nor serum vitamin D levels were associated with any sperm parameter or any reproductive hormone (all p ≥ 0.09). Discussion We did not observe an association between vitamin D status and any reproductive parameter in our study population. Conclusions Our results suggest that serum vitamin D levels are sustained in Spanish men despite low dietary intake and therefore low vitamin D does not explain the poor semen quality previously observed in these young Spanish men.