Premium
Characterization of seminal plasma proteomic alterations associated with the IVF and rescue‐ICSI pregnancy in assisted reproduction
Author(s) -
Liu X.,
Liu G.,
Zhu P.,
Wang Y.,
Wang J.,
Zhang W.,
Wang W.,
Li N.,
Wang X.,
Zhang C.,
Liu J.,
Shen X.,
Liu F.
Publication year - 2020
Publication title -
andrology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.947
H-Index - 43
eISSN - 2047-2927
pISSN - 2047-2919
DOI - 10.1111/andr.12687
Subject(s) - andrology , in vitro fertilisation , intracytoplasmic sperm injection , male infertility , biology , capacitation , sperm , human fertilization , infertility , medicine , pregnancy , microbiology and biotechnology , embryo , genetics
Background Seminal plasma is a promising diagnostic fluid for male infertility. In assisted reproduction, the seminal plasma‐based characteristics of normozoospermic men achieving successful clinical pregnancy through rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection after in vitro fertilization failure remain unclear. Objective To identify potential seminal plasma proteins to contribute to a new understanding of unexplained male factor infertility. Materials and Methods An approach with isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification labeling coupled with liquid chromatography matrix‐assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry was applied to investigate differentially expressed proteins in the seminal plasma of a rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection pregnancy group versus an in vitro fertilization pregnancy group of normozoospermic men. Result(s) The present work revealed seventy‐three differentially expressed seminal plasma proteins between the in vitro fertilization and rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection groups. Forty‐five proteins were upregulated, and 28 proteins were downregulated in the rescue intracytoplasmic sperm injection group compared with the in vitro fertilization group. Bioinformatics analyses showed that these altered proteins were involved in various functions, including the kallikrein‐related proteolytic cascade, immune response, and heparin binding. Furthermore, the validity of the proteomic results was verified by Western blot analysis of the proteins (lactoferrin [LTF], fibronectin [FN1], creatine kinase B type [CKB], kallikrein‐2 [KLK2], aminopeptidase N [ANPEP], extracellular matrix protein 1 [ECM1], glycodelin [PAEP], alpha‐1‐antitrypsin [SERPINA1], and semenogelin‐1 [SEMG1]) and immunofluorescence. Moreover, 16% of the seminal plasma proteins identified in the present work have not been reported in previous studies. Discussion This panel of altered seminal plasma proteins associated with unexplained male factor infertility might have clinical relevance and may be useful in the diagnosis and prognosis of idiopathic infertility in in vitro fertilization. Conclusions Our work not only provides a new complementary high‐confidence dataset of seminal plasma proteins but also shines new light onto the molecular characteristics of seminal plasma from normozoospermic men with different assisted reproductive outcomes.