Premium
Videolaryngoscopy vs. direct laryngoscopy use by experienced anaesthetists in patients with known difficult airways: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Author(s) -
Pieters B. M. A.,
Maas E. H. A.,
Knape J. T. A.,
van Zundert A. A. J.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
anaesthesia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.839
H-Index - 117
eISSN - 1365-2044
pISSN - 0003-2409
DOI - 10.1111/anae.14057
Subject(s) - medicine , glottis , laryngoscopy , intubation , stylet , tracheal intubation , meta analysis , airway management , anesthesia , airway , medline , laryngoscopes , cochrane library , surgery , larynx , political science , law
Summary Experienced anaesthetists can be confronted with difficult or failed tracheal intubations. We performed a systematic review and meta‐analysis to ascertain if the literature indicated if videolaryngoscopy conferred an advantage when used by experienced anaesthetists managing patients with a known difficult airway. We searched PubMed , MEDLINE , Embase and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials up to 1 January 2017. Outcome parameters extracted from studies were: first‐attempt success of tracheal intubation; time to successful intubation; number of intubation attempts; Cormack and Lehane grade; use of airway adjuncts (e.g. stylet, gum elastic bougie); and complications (e.g. mucosal and dental trauma). Nine studies, including 1329 patients, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. First‐attempt success was greater for all videolaryngoscopes (OR 0.34 (95%CI 0.18–0.66); p = 0.001). Use of videolaryngoscopy was associated with a significantly better view of the glottis (Cormack and Lehane grades 1 and 2 vs. 3–4, OR 0.04 (95%CI 0.01–0.15); p < 0.00001). Mucosal trauma occurred less with the use of videolaryngoscopy (OR 0.16 (95%CI 0.04–0.75); p = 0.02). Videolaryngoscopy has added value for the experienced anaesthetist, improving first‐time success, the view of the glottis and reducing mucosal trauma.