Premium
Patient‐controlled oral analgesia versus nurse‐controlled parenteral analgesia after caesarean section: a randomised controlled trial
Author(s) -
Bonnal A.,
Dehon A.,
Nagot N.,
Macioce V.,
Nogue E.,
Morau E.
Publication year - 2016
Publication title -
anaesthesia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.839
H-Index - 117
eISSN - 1365-2044
pISSN - 0003-2409
DOI - 10.1111/anae.13406
Subject(s) - medicine , anesthesia , patient controlled analgesia , morphine , caesarean section , randomized controlled trial , analgesic , surgery , pregnancy , biology , genetics
Summary We assessed the effectiveness of early patient‐controlled oral analgesia compared with parenteral analgesia in a randomised controlled non‐inferiority trial of women undergoing elective caesarean section under regional anaesthesia. Seventy‐seven women received multimodal paracetamol, ketoprofen and morphine analgesia. The woman having patient‐controlled oral analgesia were administered four pillboxes on the postnatal ward containing tablets and instructions for self‐medication, the first at 7 h after the spinal injection and then three more at 12‐hourly intervals. Pain at rest and on movement was evaluated using an 11‐point verbal rating scale at 2 h and then at 6‐hourly intervals for 48 h. The pre‐defined non‐inferiority limit for the difference in mean pain scores (patient‐controlled oral analgesia minus parenteral) was one. The one‐sided 95% CI of the difference in mean pain scores was significantly lower than one at all time‐points at rest and on movement, demonstrating non‐inferiority of patient‐controlled oral analgesia. More women used morphine in the patient‐controlled oral analgesia group (22 (58%)) than in the parenteral group (9 (23%); p = 0.002). The median ( IQR [range]) number of morphine doses in the patient‐controlled oral analgesia group was 2 (1–3 [1–7]) compared with 1 (1–1 [1–2]); p = 0.006) in the parenteral group. Minor drug errors or omissions were identified in five (13%) women receiving patient‐controlled oral analgesia. Pruritus was more frequent in the patient‐controlled oral analgesia group (14 (37%) vs 6 (15%) respectively; p = 0.03), but no differences were noted for other adverse events and maternal satisfaction. After elective caesarean section, early patient‐controlled oral analgesia is non‐inferior to standard parenteral analgesia for pain management, and can be one of the steps of an enhanced recovery process.