z-logo
Premium
Comparison of VivaSight double‐lumen tube with a conventional double‐lumen tube in adult patients undergoing video‐assisted thoracoscopic surgery
Author(s) -
LevyFaber D.,
Malyanker Y.,
Nir R.R.,
Best L. A.,
Barak M.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
anaesthesia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.839
H-Index - 117
eISSN - 1365-2044
pISSN - 0003-2409
DOI - 10.1111/anae.13177
Subject(s) - medicine , intubation , lumen (anatomy) , tube (container) , bronchoscopy , surgery , anesthesia , mechanical engineering , engineering
Summary The efficiency of a double‐lumen tube depends on its position in the airways, which can be verified by fibreoptic bronchoscopy. The VivaSight DL is a single‐use double‐lumen tube with a camera embedded in the tube's right side. The view from the camera appears continuously on a monitor. In this prospective study of 71 adult patients, we compared intubation times using either the VivaSight DL or a conventional double‐lumen tube . Median (IQR [range]) duration of intubation with visual confirmation of tube position was significantly reduced using the VivaSight DL compared with the conventional double‐lumen tube (51 (42–60 [35–118]) s vs 264 (233–325 [160–490]) s, respectively, p < 0.0001). None of the patients allocated to the VivaSight DL required fibreoptic bronchoscopy during intubation or surgery. The VivaSight DL enables significantly more rapid intubation compared with the conventional double‐lumen tube .

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom