z-logo
Premium
Incidence of and risk factors for difficult ventilation via a supraglottic airway device in a population of 14 480 patients from South‐East Asia
Author(s) -
Saito T.,
Liu W.,
Chew S. T. H.,
Ti L. K.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
anaesthesia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.839
H-Index - 117
eISSN - 1365-2044
pISSN - 0003-2409
DOI - 10.1111/anae.13153
Subject(s) - medicine , laryngospasm , airway , incidence (geometry) , anesthesia , bronchospasm , ventilation (architecture) , airway management , supraglottic airway , population , airway obstruction , surgery , asthma , mechanical engineering , physics , environmental health , optics , engineering
Summary Difficult airway practice guidelines include the use of a supraglottic airway device as part of the armamentarium to provide and maintain ventilation and oxygenation. We retrospectively reviewed 14 480 patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent general anaesthesia. We identified 74 (0.5%) patients whose lungs were identified as having been difficult to ventilate via a supraglottic airway device, and 29 (0.2%) patients in whom device placement failed. Multivariate analysis identified four risk factors for difficult ventilation via a supraglottic airway device: male sex ( OR 1.75, 95% CI 1.07–2.86, p = 0.02); age > 45 years ( OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.01–2.86, p = 0.04); short thyromental distance ( OR 4.35, 95% CI 2.31–8.17, p < 0.001); and limited neck movement ( OR 2.75, 95% CI 1.02–7.44, p = 0.04). Adverse respiratory events including oxygen desaturation, hypercapnoea, laryngospasm, and bronchospasm occurred in 17 patients (22%). The incidence of difficult ventilation via a supraglottic airway device was 0.5% in a large cohort of South‐East Asian patients.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom