Premium
Clinical and economic impact of a switch from high‐ to low‐volume renal replacement therapy in patients with acute kidney injury
Author(s) -
Paterson A. L.,
Johnston A. J.,
Kingston D.,
Mahroof R.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
anaesthesia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.839
H-Index - 117
eISSN - 1365-2044
pISSN - 0003-2409
DOI - 10.1111/anae.12706
Subject(s) - medicine , renal replacement therapy , acute kidney injury , intensive care unit , retrospective cohort study , intensive care , intensive care medicine , emergency medicine
Summary High‐intensity renal replacement therapy protocols in intensive care patients with acute kidney injury have failed to translate to improved patient outcomes when compared with lower‐intensity protocols. This retrospective study explored the clinical and economic impacts of switching from a 30–35 ml.kg −1 .h −1 (high‐volume) to a 20 ml.kg −1 .h −1 (low‐volume) protocol. Patients (n = 366) admitted 12 months before (n = 187) and after (n = 179) the switch were included in the study. There was no difference in in‐hospital mortality (77/187 (41%) vs 75/179 (42%), respectively, p = 0.92), intensive care unit mortality (55/187 (29%) vs 61/179 (34%), respectively, p = 0.40), duration of organ support or extent of renal recovery between the high‐ and low‐volume cohorts. A 25% reduction in daily replacement fluid usage was observed, equating to a cost saving of over £27 000 per annum. In conclusion, a switch from high‐ to low‐volume continuous haemodiafiltration had minimal effects on clinical outcomes and resulted in marked cost savings.