Premium
Palestinian counter‐forensics and the cruel paradox of property
Author(s) -
KOHLBRY PAUL
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
american ethnologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.875
H-Index - 78
eISSN - 1548-1425
pISSN - 0094-0496
DOI - 10.1111/amet.13084
Subject(s) - politics , law , state (computer science) , political science , property (philosophy) , negotiation , objectivity (philosophy) , narrative , property law , property rights , land law , land tenure , sociology , law and economics , geography , archaeology , philosophy , linguistics , epistemology , algorithm , computer science , agriculture
In disputesbetween Palestinian landowners and the Israeli state, several Palestinian surveyors in the West Bank use Ottoman‐era deeds to establish preinvasion land claims. Through a distinct practice of counter‐forensics, these surveyors transform landscapes, documents, and local knowledge into evidence of property ownership. They seek to establish the fact of Palestinian ownership before Israeli invasion and to build a legal and political narrative in which the settler state marks a deviation from scientific objectivity, liberal norms, and international political community. Counter‐forensics is part of a living archive of land defense in which property claims are both provisional and universal. As surveyors move through the cruel paradox of property, they engage in an anti‐colonial legal practice that seeks to hold the collective territory of the nation through a technical negotiation over individual plots of land. Their efforts reveal how property rights fail to protect Palestinian land, as well as why these rights remain important for those who defend the land. [ property , law , land , surveying , counter‐forensics, settler colonialism , West Bank , Israel/Palestine ]