z-logo
Premium
Object Afterlives and the Burden of History: Between “Trash” and “Heritage” in the Steps of Migrants
Author(s) -
Soto Gabriella
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
american anthropologist
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.51
H-Index - 85
eISSN - 1548-1433
pISSN - 0002-7294
DOI - 10.1111/aman.13055
Subject(s) - negotiation , politics , dialectic , object (grammar) , wilderness , history , sociology , cultural heritage , archaeology , political science , law , social science , ecology , philosophy , linguistics , epistemology , biology
With modern ruins, there may be diverging perspectives about whether the sites or objects are unsightly waste or artifacts. Among the local communities who routinely come into contact with such ruins, this viewpoint is often actively negotiated, and with it, so is history itself. Scholars of contemporary archaeology discuss the value of tracing these negotiations to understand the wider political and cultural process of historical creation, or negation. The situation becomes more complex in the wake of tragedy or disaster. Here, I explore the relationship of stakeholders on the Arizona–Sonora international border to the material culture of undocumented migrants, the objects left behind along the clandestine wilderness routes of migrant travelers abandoned en masse to ruin, as if in the fallout of disaster. But this disaster is human made, the product of US border policy. I consider these objects as a form of modern ruins that occupy a politically laden dialectical space between trash and heritage, a negotiation with ramifications for border policy. [ contemporary archaeology, ruins, trash, heritage, US‐Mexico border ]

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here