z-logo
Premium
Outcomes of donation after circulatory death kidneys undergoing hypothermic machine perfusion following static cold storage: A UK population‐based cohort study
Author(s) -
Patel Kamlesh,
Nath Jay,
Hodson James,
Inston Nicholas,
Ready Andrew
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
american journal of transplantation
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.89
H-Index - 188
eISSN - 1600-6143
pISSN - 1600-6135
DOI - 10.1111/ajt.14587
Subject(s) - machine perfusion , medicine , cold storage , confidence interval , creatinine , population , odds ratio , perfusion , renal function , cohort , donation , surgery , urology , transplantation , liver transplantation , environmental health , biology , horticulture , economics , economic growth
Evidence is currently lacking regarding the outcomes of kidneys undergoing hypothermic machine perfusion ( HMP ) in patients in the United Kingdom . Using the National Health Service Blood and Transplant database, the authors compared outcomes for recipients of single‐organ donation after circulatory death ( DCD ) kidneys preserved with HMP with those preserved using only static cold storage ( SCS ). Between 2007 and 2015, HMP was used in 19.1% (864/4,529) of kidneys. Rates of delayed graft function ( DGF ) were significantly lower in organs preserved with HMP than for organs preserved with SCS (34.2% vs 42.0%, P  < .001), despite a slightly longer cold ischemic time (median: 14.8 vs 14.1 hours, P  < .001). Multivariable analysis found the effect of preservation modality to remain significant, with HMP organs having a significantly lower rate of DGF (odds ratio 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.53‐0.80, P  < .001) and significantly shorter times to DGF resolution (average: 6.1 vs 7.4 days, P  = .003) than SCS organs. The patient ( P  = .313) and graft ( P  = .263) survival rates were similar in the 2 preservation groups. HMP was associated with a marginal functional benefit in 1‐year creatinine values ( P  = .044), with adjusted averages of 1.36 mg/ dL ( HMP ) versus 1.40 mg/ dL ( SCS ). This study supports the use of HMP and aids decision‐making over its instigation, which may improve short‐term patient outcomes.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here