Premium
Incentives for smoking cessation in a rural pharmacy setting: The Tobacco Free Communities program
Author(s) -
Breen Rachel J.,
Frandsen Mai,
Ferguson Stuart G.
Publication year - 2021
Publication title -
australian journal of rural health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.48
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 1440-1584
pISSN - 1038-5282
DOI - 10.1111/ajr.12724
Subject(s) - smoking cessation , pharmacy , medicine , abstinence , incentive program , incentive , psychological intervention , nicotine replacement therapy , family medicine , nursing , psychiatry , pathology , microeconomics , economics
Objective Investigate the smoking‐related outcomes and feasibility of a pharmacy‐led financial incentive program for smoking cessation. Design Multi‐site single‐arm trial of the Tobacco Free Communities program. Setting Community pharmacies within the Glamorgan Spring Bay (Site 1) and George Town (Site 2) municipalities of Tasmania. Participants Adult smokers. Based on funding, the recruitment target was 76 smokers. Interventions Pharmacy staff provided quitting advice through 7 sessions over 3 months. At 6 sessions, abstinent participants (no cigarettes in the previous week and expired carbon monoxide ≤4 ppm) were rewarded with AU$50 vouchers. Main outcome measures Smoking‐related outcomes were decreased smoking (self‐reported cigarettes per day and carbon monoxide levels) and abstinence rates. Feasibility outcomes were meeting the recruitment target, participant retention and participants' views of the program (measured by interview data from Site 2). Results Ninety individuals enrolled. Sixty‐two participants were included in analyses; remaining participants were excluded from analyses because they did not consent to use of their data within this study or had carbon monoxide ≤4 ppm at enrolment. Smoking (carbon monoxide and cigarettes per day) significantly decreased between enrolment and the first financial incentive session. Twelve participants (19.35%) were abstinent at the end of the program. Yet retention was poor; only 13 participants (20.97%) attended all sessions. Interviews suggested participants found the program beneficial. Conclusions Providing financial incentive within rural community pharmacies could be a viable method of encouraging smoking reductions and quit attempts. Additional work is needed to increase retention and compare effects to usual care pharmacy practices.