Premium
Effect of subjective economic status on psychological distress among farmers and non‐farmers of rural C hina
Author(s) -
Feng Danjun,
Ji Linqin,
Xu Lingzhong
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
australian journal of rural health
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.48
H-Index - 49
eISSN - 1440-1584
pISSN - 1038-5282
DOI - 10.1111/ajr.12187
Subject(s) - psychological distress , china , distress , questionnaire , psychology , medicine , socioeconomics , environmental health , mental health , geography , clinical psychology , psychiatry , economics , sociology , social science , archaeology
Objective This study aims to compare the prevalence of psychological distress between farmers and non‐farmers of rural C hina. Further, this examines the effect of subjective economic status on psychological distress and whether this effect varies between farmers and non‐farmers. Design The study design is a cross‐sectional survey. Setting The study was conducted in 27 villages of D ongying C ity in S handong P rovince. Participants Rural employed people included 1433 farmers and 584 non‐farmers. Main outcome measures Psychological distress was assessed by the K essler 10 questionnaire, and subjective economic status was assessed by a single question. Results Overall, the farmers did not report significantly higher prevalence of psychological distress than non‐farmers (31.13% versus 30.01%). However, the farmers aged 51–70 years did report significantly higher psychological distress than their non‐farmer counterparts (33.4% versus 24.2%, P = 0.04). Second, subjective economic status had a significant ( β = −0.28, P < 0.001) effect on psychological distress. Finally, subjective economic status exerted a stronger effect on psychological distress among farmers ( β = 0.30, P < 0.001) than among non‐farmers ( β = 0.20, P < 0.001). Conclusions The farmers had a comparable prevalence of psychological distress when compared with non‐farmers in rural C hina. Subjective economic status exerted a significant effect on the psychological distress of rural employed people, and this effect was stronger for the farmers than for the non‐farmers.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom