z-logo
Premium
The Two Income‐Participation Gaps
Author(s) -
Ojeda Christopher
Publication year - 2018
Publication title -
american journal of political science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.347
H-Index - 170
eISSN - 1540-5907
pISSN - 0092-5853
DOI - 10.1111/ajps.12375
Subject(s) - politics , argument (complex analysis) , underpinning , demographic economics , empirical evidence , low income , economics , political science , positive economics , biochemistry , chemistry , civil engineering , philosophy , epistemology , law , engineering
Abstract Scholars have long attributed the income‐participation gap—which is the observation that the rich participate in politics more than the poor—to income‐based differences in the resources, recruitment, mobilization, and psychology underpinning political behavior. I argue that these explanations require a longer time horizon than the empirical evidence permits. Education, for example, typically ends in young adulthood and so cannot logically mediate the effect of income on participation in late adulthood. To resolve this temporal problem, I propose that there are two income‐participation gaps: one based on current economic status and another on childhood economic history. I situate this argument in a developmental framework and present evidence for it using six studies. The results, while mixed at times, indicate that there are two gaps, that the size of each gap changes over the life course, and that their joint effect creates a larger income‐participation gap than estimated by prior research.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here