z-logo
Premium
Into the Words: Using Statutory Text to Explore the Impact of Federal Courts on State Policy Diffusion
Author(s) -
Hinkle Rachael K.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
american journal of political science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.347
H-Index - 170
eISSN - 1540-5907
pISSN - 0092-5853
DOI - 10.1111/ajps.12160
Subject(s) - constitutionality , statute , statutory law , state (computer science) , political science , law , court decision , diffusion , law and economics , business , economics , supreme court , computer science , physics , algorithm , thermodynamics
I examine the impact federal appellate courts have on state policy diffusion through the use of computational text analysis. Using a dyadic framework, I model the impact courts have on the decision to adopt a policy and, if adopted, how much text to borrow directly from another state's preexisting law. A court decision ruling a statute unconstitutional can generate up to a 28% relative reduction in the probability of adoption, and a ruling of constitutionality can both increase the probability of adoption by a similar amount and more than double the amount of borrowed text. These findings shed light on how states learn from one another.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here