z-logo
Premium
How Governments Shape the Risk of Civil Violence: India's Federal Reorganization, 1950–56
Author(s) -
Lacina Bethany
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
american journal of political science
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 6.347
H-Index - 170
eISSN - 1540-5907
pISSN - 0092-5853
DOI - 10.1111/ajps.12074
Subject(s) - grievance , state (computer science) , disadvantaged , political science , politics , civil conflict , political economy , government (linguistics) , representation (politics) , civil society , political violence , criminology , sociology , law , linguistics , philosophy , algorithm , computer science
Governments are absent from empirical studies of civil violence, except as static sources of grievance. The influence that government policy accommodations and threats of repression have on internal violence is difficult to verify without a means to identify potential militancy that did not happen. I use a within‐country research design to address this problem. During India's reorganization as a linguistic federation, every language group could have sought a state. I show that representation in the ruling party conditioned the likelihood of a violent statehood movement. Prostatehood groups that were politically advantaged over the interests opposed to them were peacefully accommodated. Statehood movements similar in political importance to their opponents used violence. Very politically disadvantaged groups refrained from mobilization, anticipating repression. These results call into question the search for a monotonic relationship between grievances and violence and the omission of domestic politics from prominent theories of civil conflict.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here