Premium
The Politics of National Recognition: Honouring Australians in a Post‐Imperial World
Author(s) -
Fox Karen,
Furphy Samuel
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
australian journal of politics and history
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.123
H-Index - 23
eISSN - 1467-8497
pISSN - 0004-9522
DOI - 10.1111/ajph.12317
Subject(s) - honour , politics , national identity , sacrifice , symbol (formal) , identity (music) , imperial unit system , political science , history , media studies , continuance , kiss (tnc) , diplomacy , law , gender studies , sociology , aesthetics , art , archaeology , computer network , computer science , programming language
The announcement in January 2015 that Prince Philip had been chosen to receive an Australian knighthood (an honour which itself had been controversially revived the previous year) sparked a fury of debate about honours, and about the continuance of a British connection in Australia's national life. Such debates were not new, echoing earlier arguments about honours as a national or imperial symbol. Through two related case studies — the Australian honours system and the Australian of the Year award — this article explores the politics of national recognition in 1970s and 1980s Australia. We consider both the politics involved in the creation and alteration of awards by which individual achievement and service are recognised by the nation, and the politics involved in imagining and recognising an Australian nation as expressed in those awards. We argue that these two institutions were more than a means to acknowledge hard work or sacrifice; they were also significant sites for contests over the nature of Australia's post‐imperial identity.