Premium
ANZSREI consensus statement on elective oocyte cryopreservation
Author(s) -
Lew Raelia,
Foo Jinny,
Kroon Ben,
Boothroyd Clare,
Chapman Michael
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
australian and new zealand journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.734
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1479-828X
pISSN - 0004-8666
DOI - 10.1111/ajo.13028
Subject(s) - oocyte cryopreservation , cryopreservation , oocyte , infertility , fertility preservation , assisted reproductive technology , guideline , gynecology , live birth , medicine , obstetrics , pregnancy , biology , fertility , population , environmental health , embryo , genetics , pathology , microbiology and biotechnology
Background One in six Australian women and couples suffer infertility. A rising proportion relates to advanced maternal age, associated with poorer oocyte quality and in vitro fertilisation ( IVF) outcomes. Internationally, oocyte cryopreservation technology applied to oocytes vitrified before 35 years provides similar live‐birth statistics compared to IVF treatment using fresh oocytes. Oocyte cryopreservation is accessible in Australasian settings and elective uptake is increasing. For women accessing treatment, oocyte cryopreservation may expand future family building options. Aims To develop the first Australasian Certification in Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility ( CREI ) subspecialist‐led consensus guideline on oocyte cryopreservation. Methods The ANZSREI ACCEPT (Australasian CREI Consensus Expert Panel on Trial evidence group) met in 2017 and 2018 and identified clinical aspects of care for inclusion and review. Review of the available evidence was conducted and consensus statements prepared. Areas of dissent of expert opinion and for further research were noted. Results Consensus was reached on definition and best practice in oocyte cryopreservation for freeze method, controlled ovarian stimulation, medical risk reduction and treatment and outcomes counselling. The term ‘social egg freezing’ may marginalise, stigmatise or attribute social blame to women, and there is a need to revise this to a neutral and non‐judgemental term such as elective or planned oocyte cryopreservation. Conclusion Oocyte cryopreservation has the potential to improve cumulative live birth outcomes for women. Implementation of this guideline should facilitate an optimal approach for providing care.