z-logo
Premium
Obstetric anal sphincter injuries among women with gestational diabetes and women without gestational diabetes: A NSW population‐based cohort study
Author(s) -
Zeki Reem,
Li Zhuoyang,
Wang Alex Y.,
Homer Caroline S.E.,
Oats Jeremy J.N.,
Marshall Drew,
Sullivan Elizabeth A.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
australian and new zealand journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.734
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1479-828X
pISSN - 0004-8666
DOI - 10.1111/ajo.12950
Subject(s) - medicine , episiotomy , obstetrics , gestational diabetes , odds ratio , confidence interval , population , anal sphincter , gynecology , pregnancy , gestation , surgery , genetics , biology , environmental health
Background Obstetric anal sphincter injuries ( OASI s) are associated with maternal morbidity; however, it is uncertain whether gestational diabetes ( GDM ) is an independent risk factor when considering birthweight mode of birth and episiotomy. Aims To compare rates of OASI s between women with GDM and women without GDM by mode of birth and birthweight. To investigate the association between episiotomy, mode of birth and the risk of OASI s. Methods A population‐based cohort study of women who gave birth vaginally in NSW , from 2007 to 2013. Rates of OASI s were compared between women with and without GDM , stratified by mode of birth, birthweight and a multi‐categorical variable of mode of birth and episiotomy. Adjusted odds ratios ( aOR ) and 95% confidence intervals ( CI ) were calculated by multivariable logistic regression. Results The rate of OASI s was 3.6% (95% CI: 2.6–2.7) vs 2.6% (95% CI: 3.4–2.8; P  <   0.001) among women with and without GDM , respectively. Women with GDM and a macrosomic baby (birthweight ≥ 4000 g) had a higher risk of OASI s with forceps ( aOR 1.76, 95% CI: 1.08–2.86, P  =   0.02) or vacuum ( aOR 1.89, 95% CI: 1.17–3.04, P  =   0.01), compared with those without GDM . For primiparous women with GDM and all women without GDM , an episiotomy with forceps was associated with lower odds of OASI s than forceps only (primiparous GDM , forceps‐episiotomy aOR 2.49, 95% CI: 2.00–3.11, forceps aOR 5.30, 95% CI: 3.72–7.54), (primiparous without GDM , forceps‐episiotomy aOR 2.71, 95% CI: 2.55–2.89, forceps aOR 5.95, 95% CI: 5.41–6.55) and (multiparous without GDM , forceps‐episiotomy aOR 3.75, 95% CI: 3.12–4.50, forceps aOR 6.20, 95% CI: 4.96–7.74). Conclusion Women with GDM and a macrosomic baby should be counselled about the increased risk of OASI s with both vacuum and forceps. With forceps birth, this risk can be partially mitigated by performing a concomitant episiotomy.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom