Premium
A better model of care after surgery for early endometrial cancer – Comprehensive needs assessment and clinical handover to a woman's general practitioner
Author(s) -
Rio Ines M.,
McNally Orla
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
australian and new zealand journal of obstetrics and gynaecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.734
H-Index - 65
eISSN - 1479-828X
pISSN - 0004-8666
DOI - 10.1111/ajo.12652
Subject(s) - medicine , endometrial cancer , family medicine , health care , nursing , cancer , gynecology , economics , economic growth
Background Endometrial cancer is the most common invasive gynaecological cancer in Australia. Despite the fact that review after treatment of early endometrial cancer has not been shown to detect recurrent disease, practice at several hospitals brings women back for specialist hospital review for 5 years after definitive cancer surgery. Aim Implement an improved model of follow‐up care following hospital treatment for early endometrial cancer. Evaluation Methods Quantitative and qualitative. Results Seventy‐three of the eligible 81 women undertook the model of care. All general practitioners (GPs) agreed to follow‐up care. Thirty‐one women (42%) and 37 GPs (51%) returned surveys. All women found the nurse consultation very useful or useful with 77% reporting making lifestyle changes and 87% found the GP consultation very useful or useful with 72% reporting making lifestyle changes. Eighty‐nine percent of GP s found the care plan useful, 94% set up patient recall systems, 79% used the care plan to develop their own care plan, 100% felt confident in providing follow‐up care with 91% reporting the care plan and hospital processes improved their confidence. Comparison with the pre‐cohort women showed: higher rates of communication at various care points to GP s (from P < 0.001); more referrals ( P < 0.001); and a projected decrease of nine hospital doctor appointments per patient. Discussion With an increasing number of people surviving cancer, in order to address holistic health needs and maintain tertiary service capacity, general practice will be required to provide more follow‐up care. Our model demonstrates an acceptable and quality mechanism for this to occur.