Is high species richness at intermediate disturbance level valuable for phylogenetic conservation? A test on bird species in South‐East Botswana

The intermediate disturbance hypothesis ( IDH ) is one of the most debated theories in ecology. However, even when evidence is provided to support the hypothesis, its relevance for phylogenetic conservation has rarely been tested. Here, we investigated this question on birds in the South‐East district of Botswana along a disturbance gradient across three types of landscapes. We first reconstructed the phylogeny for all species recorded. Next, we assessed the relationship between dissimilarity measures and habitat types using the permutational MANOVA . Finally, we tested the IDH by fitting a generalized linear mixed effect model to account for errors due to spatial pseudo‐replications of our collection design. We found that, although species richness and phylogenetic diversity ( PD ) follow the prediction of the IDH , the evolutionary component of PD (i.e. PSV , phylogenetic species variability) contributes little to the prediction, suggesting that the correlation between PD and disturbance level is driven by the richness component of PD (i.e. PSR , phylogenetic species richness). However, the increased richness at the intermediate disturbance level does not result in phylogenetically diverse bird communities, indicating that the IDH contributes little to phylogenetic diversity. Our study adds to the body of literature questioning the relevance of IDH in ecology.