Premium
Nabilone pharmacotherapy for cannabis dependence: A randomized, controlled pilot study
Author(s) -
Hill Kevin P.,
Palastro Matthew D.,
Gruber Staci A.,
Fitzmaurice Garrett M.,
Greenfield Shelly F.,
Lukas Scott E.,
Weiss Roger D.
Publication year - 2017
Publication title -
the american journal on addictions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.997
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1521-0391
pISSN - 1055-0496
DOI - 10.1111/ajad.12622
Subject(s) - tolerability , cannabis , placebo , cannabis dependence , adverse effect , medicine , craving , randomized controlled trial , psychiatry , psychology , anesthesia , cannabidiol , addiction , alternative medicine , pathology
Background and Objectives We assessed the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of nabilone, a cannabinoid agonist, to treat cannabis dependence. Methods Eighteen adults with DSM‐IV cannabis dependence were randomized to receive either 2 mg/day of nabilone ( n = 10) or placebo ( n = 8) for 10 weeks in addition to medication management. Twelve participants, six in each group, completed treatment. The safety and tolerability of nabilone was assessed at each visit. Any side effects from nabilone or the placebo were documented. Cannabis use outcomes were assessed via self‐report of days of use and twice‐weekly urine cannabinoid tests; secondary outcomes included cannabis craving and anxiety. Results We assessed safety and tolerability at each study visit. A total of eight adverse events, all mild or moderate, were reported in two participants in the nabilone group, and six events were reported in four participants in the placebo group during study treatment. A total of eight adverse events were reported in two participants in the nabilone group and six events were reported in four participants in the placebo group during study treatment. All reported adverse events were rated mild‐to‐moderate. There were no side effects deemed serious enough to be classified as an FDA‐defined serious adverse event. In general, participants in both groups reported reduced cannabis use according to self‐report over the course of the study, although these reductions were not statistically discernible. Moreover, there was no difference in cannabis use between the nabilone group and the placebo group as measured by self‐report. Discussion and Conclusions Nabilone pharmacotherapy was safe and well‐tolerated in participants with cannabis dependence. Future studies might evaluate a higher dose of nabilone to determine its effects on cannabis use outcomes in participants with cannabis dependence. Scientific Significance There remains a clear need for additional pharmacotherapy trials for cannabis dependence, and nabilone remains a candidate for such trials. (Am J Addict 2017;26:795–801)