Premium
Reference periods in retrospective behavioral self‐report: A qualitative investigation
Author(s) -
Gryczynski Jan,
Nordeck Courtney,
Mitchell Shan Gwin,
O'Grady Kevin E.,
McNeely Jennifer,
Wu LiTzy,
Schwartz Robert P.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
the american journal on addictions
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.997
H-Index - 76
eISSN - 1521-0391
pISSN - 1055-0496
DOI - 10.1111/ajad.12305
Subject(s) - recall , psychology , cognition , affect (linguistics) , interpretation (philosophy) , sample (material) , clinical psychology , social psychology , developmental psychology , medicine , cognitive psychology , psychiatry , computer science , chemistry , communication , chromatography , programming language
Background Self‐report questions in substance use research and clinical screening often ask individuals to reflect on behaviors, symptoms, or events over a specified time period. However, there are different ways of phrasing conceptually similar time frames (eg, past year vs. past 12 months). Methods We conducted focused, abbreviated cognitive interviews with a sample of community health center patients ( N = 50) to learn how they perceived and interpreted questions with alternative phrasing of similar time frames (past year vs. past 12 months; past month vs. past 30 days; past week vs. past 7 days). Results Most participants perceived the alternative time frames as identical. However, 28% suggested that the “past year” and “past 12 months” phrasings would elicit different responses by evoking distinct time periods and/or calling for different levels of recall precision. Different start and end dates for “past year” and “past 12 months” were reported by 20% of the sample. There were fewer discrepancies for shorter time frames. Conclusions Use of “past 12 months” rather than “past year” as a time frame in self‐report questions could yield more precise responses for a substantial minority of adult respondents. Scientific Significance Subtle differences in wording of conceptually similar time frames can affect the interpretation of self‐report questions and the precision of responses. (Am J Addict 2015;XX:1–4)